If you’ve searched for TRON USDT transaction fees recently, you’ve probably seen the same numbers repeated across dozens of websites:
- A USDT transfer costs 13 TRX
- Sometimes it costs 27 TRX
- Renting TRON Energy can save 80% or more
These figures were widely quoted for years.
The problem is that they no longer reflect how the TRON network works today.
In late August 2025, TRON approved and implemented Network Governance Proposal No. 104, fundamentally changing the cost of Energy. Unfortunately, many blogs, comparison websites, and even some Energy rental platforms still reference the old pricing model.
If you’re making decisions based on those numbers, you may be working with outdated information.
What Changed in Proposal No. 104?
Proposal No. 104 reduced the Energy Price on the TRON network from:
- 210 Sun per Energy
to
- 100 Sun per Energy
In practical terms, this means that when a wallet does not have enough Energy and pays by burning TRX instead, the transaction cost is now significantly lower than under the previous pricing model.
This was one of the most important fee adjustments on the TRON network in recent years.
Why Do So Many Websites Still Say 13 TRX?
The answer is surprisingly simple.
Most articles ranking in search engines today were written before Proposal No. 104 was implemented.
Those articles continue to rank well because they have accumulated backlinks and search authority over time, even though their fee calculations are based on the previous Energy price.
As a result, users continue to encounter statements such as:
“A USDT transfer costs around 13 TRX.”
or
“A TRC20 transfer may consume 27 TRX.”
Those estimates reflected the historical fee model, but they should not be treated as current network costs.
Why the “Save 80%” Claim Can Be Misleading Today
Another statement commonly found across Energy rental websites is:
“Rent TRON Energy and save over 80%.”
Again, this message was much more accurate under the previous pricing model.
After Proposal No. 104 reduced the Energy price, the cost of simply burning TRX also decreased substantially.
That means the percentage savings from renting Energy have changed.
The exact savings now depend on factors such as:
- Current Energy rental prices
- Network conditions
- The amount of Energy required
- The number of transactions you make
Rather than assuming a fixed percentage, users should compare the current burn cost with the current rental cost.
Why Real-Time Calculations Matter
Blockchain networks evolve.
Governance proposals, protocol upgrades, and market conditions can all affect transaction economics.
For this reason, static fee tables published months or years ago can quickly become outdated.
A better approach is to calculate fees using current network parameters instead of relying on historical estimates.
Why TRXLESS Shows Different Numbers
Some users notice that the estimated transaction costs displayed on TRXLESS differ from those shown on older blogs or other Energy rental platforms.
This is intentional.
TRXLESS bases its calculations on the current TRON network parameters, including the Energy pricing changes introduced by Proposal No. 104.
Instead of repeating historical estimates such as “13 TRX” or “27 TRX,” the platform reflects the fee model currently used by the network.
This helps users make decisions using up-to-date information rather than outdated assumptions.
Should You Still Rent TRON Energy?
Absolutely—but for the right reasons.
Renting Energy remains a valuable option for users who:
- Send USDT frequently
- Operate payment services
- Run exchanges or OTC desks
- Manage multiple TRON wallets
However, the decision should be based on today’s economics, not fee estimates published before Proposal No. 104.
The key question is no longer:
“Can I save 80%?”
Instead, it is:
“Is renting Energy cheaper than burning TRX at today’s network price?”
That comparison should always use current data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a TRC20 USDT transfer still cost 13 TRX?
Not necessarily. The widely quoted 13 TRX figure was based on the previous Energy pricing model. After Proposal No. 104 reduced the Energy price, actual burn costs became significantly lower.
Is renting TRON Energy still useful?
Yes. Renting Energy can still reduce costs for many users, especially those making frequent TRC20 transfers. The exact benefit depends on current rental prices and your transaction volume.
Why do different websites show different transaction fees?
Many websites continue to publish historical fee estimates that were accurate before Proposal No. 104. Platforms using live network parameters may display different—and more current—cost estimates.
Final Thoughts
The TRON network is not static.
When governance proposals change core network parameters, transaction costs change as well.
Proposal No. 104 significantly reduced the Energy price, making many older fee estimates outdated.
Before deciding whether to burn TRX or rent Energy, it’s worth checking calculations based on the current network rules, not figures that were accurate a year ago.
As the TRON ecosystem continues to evolve, keeping fee calculations up to date is just as important as keeping wallet software up to date.